What it is, in one sentence
A service window on the catalogue you already run, answering six questions that any clerk would understand, and refusing everything else until you say otherwise.
Buying software now asks for price, stock and lead time by itself, and it acts on whatever comes back. We make an industrial catalogue readable, answerable and auditable by those agents, inside your own infrastructure and without moving your data.
Check your own domain on the right. Twelve checks, three seconds, no account, nothing stored, no private address requested. The quote underneath is generated from your own scan.
A buying assistant, not a person, is increasingly the one asking what you have, how many, how fast and how much. It asks your website the way one program asks another. If your site only answers people, the assistant moves on and you never hear the request you lost.
Nothing here needs a new system. Your catalogue and your prices stay where they are. What changes is that a machine can ask about them, under rules you set, and you receive the log of what was asked.
Autonomous purchasing was standardised in four layers, and three of them are owned by the platforms. The first one, the layer that lets anyone ask your catalogue a question, is the only one that has to run inside your own systems. That is the layer this product builds.
The door an assistant knocks on when it wants to know something about your catalogue. It is yours, and today it is closed.
How the order gets placed once the assistant has decided to buy. Google and OpenAI own this one.
Proof that a real buyer allowed the spend. Owned by the same platforms, handed to the standards bodies.
The payment, counted in cents per question. Stripe and Coinbase own it and charge almost nothing.
Read the detail layer by layer, with owners and dates: the agent economy.
The gateway is a reader, not a warehouse. It stands in front of the systems you already run and answers questions on their behalf, under rules you set, and every call is logged for you.
A service window on the catalogue you already run, answering six questions that any clerk would understand, and refusing everything else until you say otherwise.
Not a new ERP, not a data warehouse, not a marketplace, and not a place where your contract prices are copied. In the first month it does not even accept orders.
Three questions a buying assistant asks, and what it gets from a typical distributor site today against what it gets once the gateway is in place.
We requested twenty-two US industrial distributors as a program, not as a browser. Each bar is one check across all of them: green passes, amber partly answers, red refuses. The right column is the same thing in plain words.
The pattern is not random. The checks almost everyone passes are the free ones: a sitemap, and being allowed in at all. Every check that requires a decision about machines fails across the whole industry at once, which is why this is a decision problem rather than a technology problem. Every row, every response code: the evidence, raw data in field-run.json.
Every marker below is a standard that shipped, or a compliance date a regulator has already published. This is not a forecast.
We sent the requests a procurement agent would send to seven distributor sites on 16 October 2026. This is what came back.
| What the agent asks | What most sites return | Cost to you |
|---|---|---|
| "Do you have 6205-2RS in stock" | A 404 from a script, or a page with no price and no stock | The agent recommends another supplier |
| "What does it cost for my account" | Nothing machine-readable: the price is rendered for a human only | You are compared on list price, not on your agreement |
| "Send the datasheet and the certificate" | No document endpoint exists, so the agent guesses from a description | Compliance risk lands on the buyer, and then on you |
Four of the seven refused the search path outright, one served a captcha, one returned a large page with no price anywhere in it, and one did not answer at all. None returned a price, a stock figure and a document together.
Three products in sequence. The diagnostic exists so you never buy the gateway on faith, and the records exist so what an agent relays about you can be checked years later.
A live agent run against your public surface and, under NDA, your catalogue. You get the raw transcript: every request, every response code, every search that returned nothing.
Six tools over the catalogue you already run, under your access rules, read-only for the first month, with every call logged and delivered to you.
Signed records for the facts that have to survive an audit, each with the basis of the claim stated separately and the evidence bound by its fingerprint.
The work is already being bought in three other forms. Comparing them honestly is more useful than another list of features, and it tells you what our floor price is competing with.
| Route | What it costs | What it actually changes | Does your catalogue answer? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Agency retainer, AI visibility | median $6,850 a month (First Page Sage, 1,146 quotes, Oct 2026) | They write content and try to get you mentioned in AI answers. Your catalogue still cannot be asked a question. | no |
| A visibility dashboard | a subscription, usually a few hundred a month | It shows where you appear. It changes nothing in your own systems. | no |
| Build it yourself | your developers, several months, then maintenance | Full control. You also own the mapping to conventions that keep moving. | partly |
| Connect.ARLI gateway | $1,500 to $4,500 a month, metered, from $8,000 to connect | Reads the catalogue where it lives and answers the six questions, under your rules, with every call logged. | yes |
The first two routes sell attention. The third sells control and costs you a year. The fourth is the only one that changes what a machine can get out of your catalogue, and it is priced below the first one. The longer comparison, in plain words: plain words.
Market rates for this work are published, so we price against them rather than against our own ambitions. The median agency retainer buys attention; ours buys a catalogue that answers.
Verified by buyers, brokers and auditors: free, forever, without an account. Full price list and worked examples: pricing.
Six answers that a procurement review asks for, in the order the questions usually arrive.
Read-only in the first month. The gateway answers from your systems and stores nothing about your catalogue contents.
Your rules decide who sees which price. No contract price is published. We never see the contents of a buyer agreement.
Every call, every refusal, every question that returned nothing, in your hands rather than in our dashboard.
A catalogue, a record or an entire deployment can be withdrawn without a support ticket.
Enterprise deployments run inside your environment, with SSO and your own audit trail.
We are small and honest about it. Ask for the questionnaire and we fill it in before any commercial conversation.
Data flow, obligations and the cryptography behind the records: security.
You are not buying traffic from us and we do not promise any. What you are buying is the position, and the work that makes a catalogue correct for machines also makes it correct for people.
came from agents on enterprise sites, in the figures we could verify.
say they would let an AI complete a purchase on their behalf today.
more than 40% of agentic projects to be cancelled before the end of it. We do not sell agent traffic.
Send a domain and a product line. We run the diagnostic and send the transcript before any invoice.
hq@arliwork.com · Shenzhen Capernaum Technology Co., Ltd · PIAKHOUSKI DZMITRY